Кафедра "Фінанси та економічна безпека"

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://crust.ust.edu.ua/handle/123456789/645

ENG: Chair "Finance and Economic Safety"

Browse

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item,
    Methodical Principles of Stability Assessment of the Social-Economic Systems
    (Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolayiv, 2016) Chymshyt, Serhiy I.; Prylyepova, Maryna O.
    EN: The article deals with the functional development of the social economic systems (the SES) of different types. Development of the SES can be steady for a suffi ciently long period. Of course, any SES develops through certain cycles, repeated at regular intervals, which means the arising of the appropriate crises. In addition, as theory and practice of management shows, the crisis of the SES is somehow a positive fact, since it stimulates the search and implementation of new management methods and tools. Crisis is some kind of fi lter of natural selection and checking SES ability to survive. This paper analyses stability. It is argued that the main starting condition for sustainable development is an internal quality system. The essence of the concept of stability in the activity of industrial and economic system is defi ned. It is noted that the stability is an indicator of the quality of management system, internal quality mechanism of functioning of the SES. It is concluded that stability is a sign of the quality of processes, their controllability and minimization of risks. Moreover, it can be identifi ed with the concepts of consistency, ordering, and handling. The stability of the SES means that the results of its activities have minor fl uctuations regarding a particular medium trend of development. The more the spread of indicators around a particular trend, refl ecting the results of economic activity of SES, the more random processes in these results. The more factors’ infl uence on the result that are not governed the less organized internal mechanisms and appropriate processes. This leads to the fact that activities’ results of the SES are random and not natural variables. Randomness is a feature of not controllability of process. Randomness is a sign of SES’s low quality of management system as a whole or its individual processes.