Browsing by Author "Duchesne, Marc"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item,
    Electrically Heated Fluidized Bed for Graphite Purification: Heat Transfer and Electric Resistivity Models for Scale-Up
    (Springer Nature, 2025) Ahmed, Imtiaz; Fedorov, Serhii S.; Sybir, Artem; Hubynskyi, Semen M.; Duchesne, Marc
    ENG: Electrothermal purification is an effective method for achieving over 99.9 pct purity for graphite particles with minimal environmental impact. However, the lack of a suitable heat and electric resistivity model has hindered the scaling up of electrically heated fluidized bed (EHFB) reactors for graphite purification. In this study, three commercial natural graphite flake populations were tested in a bench-scale fluidized bed reactor at temperatures of up to 1000 °C. The experiments varied key parameters, including the graphite particle size, particle bed temperature, fluidization index, and electrode depth within the particle bed. Controlling the fluidized bed reactor at high temperatures requires an understanding of bed resistivity and how current flows throughout the EHFB system. The results show that fluidized bed resistivity decreases with temperature, with a diminished effect at higher temperatures. Smaller particles exhibit a higher resistance, likely due to a larger number of contact points required to pass current between the electrodes. In this study, a Finite Difference Method (FDM) model was developed using Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) in Excel®. Additionally, a Finite Element Method (FEM) model was created using COMSOL Multiphysics®. The FDM model assumes the current flows only radially, whereas the FEM model accounts for both radial and vertical current flow. The FDM model was validated against experimental data. Additionally, the FDM model was verified through a comparison with the FEM model. The FDM model showed good agreement with experimental resistance data and moderate agreement with power consumption, while the FEM model provided more accurate predictions by accounting for a detailed geometry and heat loss mechanisms. Achieving a uniform temperature distribution within the fluidized bed is influenced by the electrode’s contact area. Deeper immersion of the electrode enhances thermal uniformity and provides results that more closely match experimental observations.