Browsing by Author "Novokshonova, Nataliia Oleksandrivna"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item type:Item,
    “The Picture of the World” in the Concept Sphere of Conflictology: Narratives of Popular Culture VS Feminism in Postmodern Society
    (Південноукраїнський національний педагогічний університет імені К.Д. Ушинського, Одеса, 2020) Novokshonova, Nataliia Oleksandrivna
    EN: The conflict as a specific socio-cultural, political and psychological phenomenon represented both at the level of the individual and in the scope of global geopolitical transformations, is being deeply rooted in the self-consciousness of individuals being the factor of socio-cultural and political dynamics in the modern “picture of the world”. The interaction of the given philosophic processes is complicated and ambivalent, hence follows the aim of the article as accentuation of theoretical and empirical specificity of the “conflict” in the discourses of pop-culture, in general, and feminism, in particular. The conflictological theories of recent years are closely linked with acknowledging discursive nature of theoretical knowledge and narrative features of “living life” practices in postmodernity. The postmodern representation of mass discourses and narratives blocks the production and acceptance of real conflicts, assimilating the plurality of subjects’ provisions according to a single regulatory model, on the one hand, and, on the other, preserving or deepening the contradictions among “interests” and “agendas” of different doctrinal foundations. As conflictology is an interdisciplinary area of knowledge, the methods, used in the analysis, represent complex systematic approaches to the given philosophic and historical process with the stress on the hermeneutical, phenomenological, and social construction techniques. The analysis makes it evident that the sign systems, generated by popular culture, provoke the creation of the illusory reality that distorts the conceptual sphere of the “picture of the world” and blocks the acceptance of real conflicts, deepening the contradictions among “agendas” of the different doctrinal trends.